Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: II only
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question tests deductive reasoning from fixed facts about counts and categories. We must determine which follow-up statements are guaranteed to be true, not merely possible. Words like “must” signal logical necessity, so any statement that could be false under some valid arrangement is not a fact.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Translate the counts into certain truths and then check each candidate statement. Any statement relying on an unprovided link (for example, tying eye color to sex) is not logically compelled. The goal is to see whether a statement is true in every arrangement that satisfies the facts.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Construct two valid arrangements: (A) Boys = both blue, Girls = both brown (valid); (B) Boys = both brown, Girls = both blue (also valid). II holds in both arrangements; I and III do not hold in all arrangements. Hence only II must be true.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming an unstated link between attributes (e.g., girls more likely to have a certain eye color). Counts alone cannot impose that link.
Final Answer:
II only
Discussion & Comments