Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: I only
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This is a straightforward application of categorical logic. From a universal statement about islands and a specific statement identifying Maui as an island, we can infer a specific property about Maui. We must resist adding universal claims about volcanoes that are not provided.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Apply universal instantiation: if all elements of a set have property P, and X is a member of that set, then X has property P. Do not generalize from a single example (Maui) to all islands or all volcanoes.
Step-by-Step Solution:
From 1) and 2): Since Maui is an island and every island is surrounded by water, conclude that Maui is surrounded by water.Statement II (“All islands are formed by volcanoes”) is not implied by Maui's formation.Statement III (“All volcanoes are on islands”) is also not implied; many volcanoes exist on continents.Verification / Alternative check:Generic logic pattern: All A are B; X is A; therefore X is B. This matches 1) and 2). Statements II and III attempt unjustified universal generalizations.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Confusing an example (“Maui was formed by a volcano”) with a universal law applying to all islands or all volcanoes.
Final Answer:I only
Discussion & Comments