Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: I only
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a straightforward application of categorical logic. From a universal statement about islands and a specific statement identifying Maui as an island, we can infer a specific property about Maui. We must resist adding universal claims about volcanoes that are not provided.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Apply universal instantiation: if all elements of a set have property P, and X is a member of that set, then X has property P. Do not generalize from a single example (Maui) to all islands or all volcanoes.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Generic logic pattern: All A are B; X is A; therefore X is B. This matches 1) and 2). Statements II and III attempt unjustified universal generalizations.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing an example (“Maui was formed by a volcano”) with a universal law applying to all islands or all volcanoes.
Final Answer:
I only
Discussion & Comments