Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Astronomy
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Discipline-mapping analogies connect a subject or object to the scientific field that studies it. 'Disease → Pathology' names the branch of science that investigates diseases. We must mirror this with 'Planet → ?' by picking the authentic scientific discipline that studies planets and other celestial bodies.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
We keep the pairing as 'entity → legitimate field of study'. For diseases, the recognized scientific study is pathology; for planets and celestial phenomena, the recognized scientific field is astronomy (and its subfields like planetary science and astrophysics). Astrology, though historically linked etymologically, is not a scientific discipline and thereby fails the mapping requirement.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Extract relation: subject → scientific field.2) Disease → Pathology (valid scientific mapping).3) Planet → Astronomy (legitimate science of celestial bodies).4) Select 'Astronomy' among the options.
Verification / Alternative check:
University departments and scientific journals treat planetary studies under astronomy/planetary science. Astrology does not satisfy scientific standards of evidence and method, confirming 'Astronomy' as the accurate counterpart.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing historically related but non-scientific terms (astrology) with actual sciences (astronomy). Always select the recognized discipline.
Final Answer:
Astronomy
Discussion & Comments