Statement: Should there be students union in college/university?

Arguments:

1. No. This will create a political atmosphere in the campus.
2. Yes, it is very necessary Students are future political leaders.

Clearly, harnessing solar energy will be helpful as it is an inexhaustible resource unlike other resources. So, argument I holds. But argument II is vague as solar energy is the cheapest form of energy.

Clearly, health of the citizens is an issue of major concern for the Government. So, a product like drugs, must be first studied and tested in the Indian context before giving licence for its sale. So, only argument I holds strong.

Clearly, India can export only the surplus and that which can be saved after fulfilling its own needs, to pay for its imports. Encouragement to export cannot lead to shortages as it shall provide the resources for imports. So, only argument I holds.

The passage discusses the autonomy of art, emphasizing that art must be self-contained and not influenced by anything other than itself. It insists that art alone must bring the work into being, free from external interference. Here's the analysis of the options based on the passage:

1. Option A - art is governed by external rules and conditions:
   • The passage argues that art should not be governed by anything other than itself. It directly contradicts the idea that art is ruled by external conditions or rules.
   • This option is not supported by the passage.
2. Option B - art is for the sake of art and life:
   • The passage focuses on the autonomy of art itself, rather than its connection to life. While art can have life-related themes, the passage emphasizes that art must exist for itself, not for the sake of life.
   • This option is not fully supported by the passage.
3. Option C - art is for the sake of art alone:
   • The passage strongly supports the idea that art must be self-contained and not influenced by anything outside of art itself. This aligns with the statement that art is for the sake of art alone.
   • This option is strongly supported by the passage.
4. Option D - artist realises his dreams through his artistic creation:
   • The passage does not discuss the artist realizing their dreams through art. Instead, it focuses on the self-contained nature of art and its need to be untouched by external forces.
   • This option is not supported by the passage.
5. Option E - artist should use his art for the sake of society:
   • The passage emphasizes that art should not be influenced by anything external, including society. It suggests that art must exist for its own sake, not for societal purposes.
   • This option is not supported by the passage.
6. Final Answer:
   • The best supported statement by the passage is C. art is for the sake of art alone.

The passage discusses the shift in the economy from a manufacturing focus to a service orientation, and how this change will require managers to work more with people than with objects from the assembly line. Here's the analysis of the options based on the passage:

1. Option A - managers should have a balanced mind:
   • The passage does not mention the need for managers to have a balanced mind. Instead, it focuses on the shift from manufacturing to service sectors and how it will impact the role of managers in terms of working with people.
   • This option is not supported by the passage.
2. Option B - assembly line will exist in service organisations:
   • The passage does not suggest that assembly lines will exist in service organizations. It contrasts the work with people in the service sector to working with objects in the manufacturing sector.
   • This option is not supported by the passage.
3. Option C - interpersonal skills will become more important in the future workplace:
   • The passage clearly states that as the economy shifts to a service orientation, managers will need to work more with people, indicating that interpersonal skills will indeed become more important in the future workplace.
   • This option is strongly supported by the passage.
4. Option D - manufacturing organisations ignore importance of people:
   • The passage does not suggest that manufacturing organizations ignore the importance of people. It only contrasts the focus on people in service sectors versus objects in manufacturing sectors. It does not make a negative statement about manufacturing organizations.
   • This option is not supported by the passage.
5. Option E - service organisations will not deal with objects and things:
   • The passage discusses how managers in service organizations will work more with people, but it does not claim that service organizations will not deal with objects and things at all. It focuses on the shift from manufacturing, where managers work with objects, to services, where the focus is on people.
   • This option is not fully supported by the passage.
6. Final Answer:
   • The best supported statement by the passage is C. interpersonal skills will become more important in the future workplace.

Clearly, India cannot part with a state that is a major foreign exchange earner to it. So, argument I holds strong. Further, giving away a piece of land unconditionally and unreasonably is no solution to settle disputes. So, argument II is vague.

Clearly, cottage industries need to be promoted to create more job opportunities for rural people in the villages themselves. The reason that rural people are creative is vague. So, only argument II holds.

Clearly, encouraging the young entrepreneurs will open up the field for the establishment of new industries. Thus, it shall help in industrial development and not only employ the entrepreneurs but create more job opportunities for others as well. So, both the arguments hold strong.

Clearly, neither the students can be burdened with studies at such a tender age, nor can they be left free to take studies casually, as this shall weaken their basic foundation. So, both the arguments follow.

Clearly, every person must be free to work wherever he wants and no compulsion should be made to confine one to one's own country. So, argument I is vague. However, talented scientists can be of great benefit to the nation and some alternatives as special incentives or better prospects may be made available to them to retain them within their motherland. So, argument II also does not hold.