Home » Logical Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should there be an upper age limit of 65 years for contesting Parliamentary/ Legislative Assembly elections? Arguments: Yes. Generally, people above the age of 65 lose their dynamism and will power. No. The life span is so increased that people remain physically and mentally active even up to the age of 80.

Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong

Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is strong

Explanation:

The age of a person is no criterion for judging his mental capabilities and administrative qualities. So, none of the arguments holds strong.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should new big industries be started in Mumbai? Arguments: Yes. It will create job opportunities. No. It will further add to the pollution of the city.
Statement: Should high chimneys be installed in industries? Arguments: Yes. It reduces pollution at ground level. No. It increases pollution in upper atmosphere.
Statement: Does India need so many plans for development? Arguments: Yes. Nothing can be achieved without proper planning. No. Too much time, money and energy is wasted on planning.
Statement: Should articles of only deserving authors be allowed to be published? Arguments: Yes. It will save a lot of paper which is in short supply. No. It is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving.
Statement: Should colleges be given the status of a university in India? Arguments: Yes. Colleges are in a better position to assess the student's performance and therefore the degrees will be more valid. No. It is Utopian to think that there will not be nepotism and corruption in awarding degrees by colleges.
Statement: Should the prestigious people who have committed crime unknowingly, be met with special treatment? Arguments: Yes. The prestigious people do not commit crime intentionally. No. It is our policy that everybody is equal before the law.
Statement: Can pollution be controlled? Arguments: Yes. If everyone realizes the hazards it may create and cooperates to get rid of it, pollution may be controlled. No. The crowded highways, factories and industries and an ever-growing population eager to acquire more and more land for constructing houses are beyond control.
Statement: Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises? Arguments: Yes. This is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better services to the public. No. This will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.
Statement: Should internal assessment in colleges be abolished? Arguments: Yes. This will help in reducing the possibility of favouritism. No, teaching faculty will lose control over students.
Statement: Should all the unauthorized structures in the city be demolished? Arguments: No. Where will the people residing in such houses live? Yes. This will give a clear message to general public and they will refrain from constructing unauthorized buildings.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion