Critical reasoning — scrapping formal education beyond graduation: Should the system of education after graduation be scrapped, with the pro-argument emphasizing earlier employment and the counter-argument warning that educational depth would suffer?

Given data

• Statement: Scrap education beyond graduation?
• Argument I (Yes): People can take employment earlier.
• Argument II (No): Scrapping would reduce depth of knowledge.

Concept/Approach (weighing outcome relevance)
A strong argument should connect directly to the purpose of education. Depth and expertise are core objectives of post-graduate study; mere earlier employment is a narrow, short-term gain.

Step 1: Assess Argument I
Earlier employment is not a sufficient reason to eliminate advanced education across disciplines; it ignores societal needs for specialists and research.

Step 2: Assess Argument II
Directly addresses the core function—advanced depth—which would indeed be harmed by scrapping the system. Hence strong.

Final Answer
Only argument II is strong.