Arguments evaluation (territorial question about Kashmir): Should India give away Kashmir to Pakistan? Evaluate—(I) No: Kashmir is beautiful and earns foreign exchange, (II) Yes: doing so would help settle conflicts—determine which argument(s) are strong on logic and relevance.

Given data

• Question concerns sovereignty and national integrity.
• I: Opposes on grounds of beauty and foreign exchange earnings.
• II: Supports on grounds that it would settle conflicts.

Concept / Approach
Arguments about territorial integrity must hinge on constitutional, legal, strategic, and humanitarian bases—not tourism or speculative pacification.

Step-by-step evaluation
Step 1: I cites beauty and forex—irrelevant to sovereignty decisions.Step 2: II assumes ceding territory automatically ends conflict—a simplistic and unsubstantiated claim.Step 3: Hence, neither argument is strong.

Verification / Alternative
Sound arguments would address constitutional rights, people's will, security, and international law—none appear here.

Common pitfalls

• Accepting emotionally appealing or naive consequentialist claims in place of robust grounds.

Final Answer
Neither I nor II is strong.