Ease of information storage with digital techniques: generally easy or not? Consider modern practice in data storage. Evaluate the statement: “Using digital techniques of information storage is easy.” Determine whether, in general engineering contexts, this statement holds true compared to analog storage.

Introduction / Context:
Digital storage dominates computing because it is practical, scalable, and robust. The statement uses the word “easy,” which we interpret under the Recovery-First policy as “generally simpler and more reliable to implement and manage than analog storage” in mainstream engineering contexts.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• We compare digital storage (flash, magnetic, optical, solid-state) to analog counterparts (magnetic tape with analog tracks, analog film).
• “Easy” refers to copying, error detection/correction, indexing, random access, and fidelity retention over generations.
• Modern systems include file systems, redundancy (RAID), and error-correcting codes.

Concept / Approach:
Digital storage represents information as discrete symbols, enabling perfect copying when error-free and robust recovery with ECC when errors occur. It supports random access, efficient search, compression, and encryption. These features typically make design, use, and maintenance easier than analog media, where noise and generational copying degrade quality continuously.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Practical evidence: cloud storage, SSDs, and HDDs provide reliable, automated management and integrity features not feasible with analog media at scale.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Overinterpreting “easy” as “trivial.” Engineering still demands careful design (wear leveling, redundancy), but the net difficulty is lower than analog for comparable tasks.

Final Answer:
Correct