ROM verification by checksum — what does it tell you? When using the checksum method to test a ROM image, what information does a checksum failure actually provide?

Introduction / Context:
Checksums and hashes are common techniques for verifying firmware integrity in ROM/Flash. A checksum provides a quick integrity check but conveys limited diagnostic information when it fails.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A checksum is typically a simple arithmetic or logical summary of all ROM bytes.
• A mismatch indicates at least one bit/byte differs from the expected image.
• No location-specific error correction information is inherent in a basic checksum.

Concept / Approach:

Because a checksum compresses the entire contents into a short value, many different error patterns can produce the same failure indication. Therefore, a failing checksum only signals that the image is not identical; it does not tell you where or how many bytes are wrong, nor does it correct them.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Contrast with error-correcting codes (ECC) or cryptographic hashes with chunking—those can help locate or correct errors; a simple checksum does not.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Options A and C imply location or count information—basic checksums do not provide this.
• Option B suggests correction capability, which requires ECC, not a simple checksum.

Common Pitfalls:

• Over-relying on checksums for diagnostics; they are detection tools, not repair tools.

Final Answer:

simply indicates that the contents of the ROM are incorrect.