Synchronous vs. asynchronous behavior Gated SR flip-flops are called asynchronous because their outputs respond immediately to input changes. Is this statement correct?

Introduction / Context:
Sequential elements can have inputs that are either synchronous (qualified by a clock or gate) or asynchronous (acting immediately regardless of clock). Mislabeling these behaviors leads to design errors and timing violations. This question examines the common confusion surrounding gated SR flip-flops and asynchronous controls like PRE/CLR.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A gated SR device includes a gate/clock input that enables state changes only during specific levels.
• Asynchronous inputs (if present) are separate lines such as preset (PRE) and clear (CLR), often active-LOW.
• We evaluate whether gated SR is inherently asynchronous.

Concept / Approach:
By definition, synchronous inputs affect the state only in relation to a gating signal or clock. In a gated SR flip-flop, S and R are evaluated only when the gate is active; otherwise the output holds. Asynchronous inputs bypass the gate and can change the state immediately at any time. Therefore, calling a gated SR flip-flop “asynchronous” because it responds immediately is incorrect.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Consult timing diagrams: setup/hold times are defined relative to the gate for S and R, confirming synchrony. PRE/CLR timing is specified independently, highlighting their asynchronous nature.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• True: Would conflate synchronous gating with immediate, clock-independent action.

Common Pitfalls:
Mixing up level-sensitive gating (synchronous) with asynchronous override signals; assuming any instantaneous response implies “asynchronous.”

Final Answer:
False