Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both statements together are NOT sufficient.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:We need to identify the unique maximum among four schools given partial inequalities. DS focuses on whether D is necessarily the maximum or whether another school (e.g., B) could exceed D.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Combine inequalities and check if D must be strictly the largest, or if another candidate (e.g., B) can surpass D under the constraints.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I alone: Only A < D is known; B and C could be above or below D. Not sufficient.2) II alone: Only C < D is known; A and B unknown. Not sufficient.3) I + II: We have A < D and C < D. However, there is no information about B vs D. It is possible that B > D, making B the highest; or B < D, making D the highest. The top school is not uniquely determined.Verification / Alternative check:Scenarios: (a) Let counts be A=100, B=400, C=90, D=300 ⇒ highest=B. (b) A=100, B=250, C=90, D=300 ⇒ highest=D. Both satisfy I and II.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Assuming transitivity where none exists (no relation given for B).
Final Answer:Both statements together are NOT sufficient.
Discussion & Comments