Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both statements together are necessary
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
We must deduce whether D is S’s mother from family relations.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Combine sibling info with the fixed count of L’s children and the marriage of L and D.
Step-by-Step Reasoning:
From II: N, S, P are siblings (N is brother of both S and P). Also P is child of L ⇒ N and S are (typically) children of L as well.From I: L has exactly three children ⇒ the set of L’s children is {N, S, P}.Since L is married to D, and no alternative mother is indicated, D is the mother of L’s children under the usual assumption.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I alone gives no link to S; II alone gives no link to D; both are needed to tie S to L and then to D.
Common Pitfalls:
Allowing step/adoptive exceptions without textual support; DS uses minimal standard assumptions.
Final Answer:
Both statements together are necessary.
Discussion & Comments