Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Even both statements together are not sufficient
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
We are asked for the completion time for 14 men. The statements give only women- and children-based work rates. No cross-equivalence is provided.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
To find men’s time, we need men’s rate (or a conversion factor to women/children). Absent any conversion, the unknown scale for men makes the target uncomputable.
Step-by-Step Reasoning:
I alone: provides only women’s aggregate rate; tells nothing about men.II alone: provides only children’s aggregate rate; tells nothing about men.I + II: still no linkage to men, so men’s rate remains undetermined.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option claiming sufficiency is incorrect because a key conversion (man↔woman/child) is missing.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming a conventional equivalence like “1 man = 2 women” without it being stated; data sufficiency disallows that.
Final Answer:
Even both statements together are not sufficient.
Discussion & Comments