Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Correct
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Coprocessors augment a general-purpose CPU by handling particular classes of operations more efficiently. Classic examples include floating-point units (FPUs), graphics coprocessors, and cryptographic accelerators. They typically implement a narrower, domain-specific instruction set and provide hardware datapaths optimized for those operations, thereby speeding up tasks that would be slower in the general CPU.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
An FPU coprocessor executes arithmetic-intensive instructions (add, multiply, divide, transcendental functions) using dedicated pipelines and wide datapaths. Because the instruction repertoire and microarchitecture are focused, performance per watt and per cycle for those tasks is much higher than emulation in software on the main CPU. This design epitomizes a “limited instruction set optimized for speed” in its domain, making the statement accurate.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Historically, x87 FPUs (e.g., 8087) accelerated floating-point by orders of magnitude compared to integer-only CPUs. Modern SoCs integrate similar accelerators (NEON, AVX units, GPU shaders, AES engines) that embody the same principle.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Limiting to DSPs or GPUs ignores FPUs and crypto engines. Microcoding is an implementation detail; specialization does not require microcode. “Incorrect” contradicts widespread design practice.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing coprocessors with general multicore CPUs; assuming “limited” implies weak—specialization yields higher performance in the target domain.
Final Answer:
Correct
Discussion & Comments