Problem definition elements: Which component of a problem statement answers, “What should the user see printed or displayed on the screen?”

Introduction / Context:
Clear problem statements separate inputs, processing, and outputs so analysts and developers can design and test solutions systematically. Identifying expected outputs upfront prevents costly rework and aligns stakeholder expectations about reports, screens, and integrations.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A problem statement should specify inputs, required processing, and expected outputs.
• Outputs include content, format, timing, and delivery channel.
• Validation will compare actual outputs to these specifications.

Concept / Approach:
The Output section defines what results the system must present or deliver: fields, calculations, sorting/grouping, layout, and frequency. Inputs describe what data is provided; processing defines how the data is transformed. By locking down outputs early, teams can derive test cases and ensure that the system’s value to users is realized in visible artifacts such as dashboards and printed reports.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Traceability matrices map requirements to output elements, ensuring completeness and testability.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Input is what is provided; Processing is how it is transformed; Purpose states the goal, not the visible result.

Common Pitfalls:
Leaving output formats vague; not specifying edge cases; forgetting export or accessibility requirements.

Final Answer:
Output