Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: x ≥ y
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When comparing two quadratics, each with two real roots, we must confirm that a proposed inequality holds across all four pairings (each x with each y). A single counterexample invalidates a universal statement like x ≥ y. Here we solve both quadratics and compare the root sets carefully.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Compute exact roots via discriminants. Then order the roots numerically and check whether the smallest x is still ≥ the largest y (for x ≥ y), or similar tests for other relations. If equality can occur for some pairing and strict inequality for others, then ≥ (not >) may be the correct consistent relation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Test all pairings: (−0.75 ≥ −0.833…), (−0.75 ≥ −1.5), (−0.833… ≥ −0.833…), (−0.833… ≥ −1.5). All hold; at least one pairing yields equality, so x ≥ y is the strongest always-true statement.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking equal roots across equations or assuming strict inequality without testing equality. Always check extremes to decide between > and ≥.
Final Answer:
x ≥ y
Discussion & Comments