Question 1

For hill roads around 300 m above mean sea level (MSL), the ruling gradient commonly adopted is:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Gradient selection in hilly terrain balances vehicle power limits, safety, and earthwork costs. The ruling gradient is the preferred maximum used for most of the route, with limiting and exceptional gradients reserved for constrained sections. Given Data / Assumptions: Hill road near 300 m elevation (moderate altitude). Target: typical ruling gradient for design in such terrain. Concept / Approach: Ruling gradients for hilly/mountainous roads are steeper than for plains, but still need to be comfortable for heavy vehicles. Values around 5% are commonly adopted as ruling, with limiting 6% and exceptional up to 7% for short stretches where topography dictates. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify context: hilly terrain, moderate elevation.Adopt ruling gradient ≈ 5% (1 in 20).Use limiting/exceptional gradients only where necessary to control earthwork and land impacts. Verification / Alternative check: Vehicle gradeability, especially for loaded trucks and buses, suggests that maintaining gradients near 5% promotes safe speeds and manageable power demands while avoiding excessive hairpins and long detours. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 4%: conservative; increases road length and cost in hills. 6% and 7%: align with limiting/exceptional, not ruling. 8%: too steep for routine ruling gradient; used only under special constraints for very short lengths. Common Pitfalls: Applying plain-terrain gradients to hill roads. Overusing exceptional gradients, which impair heavy vehicle performance and safety. Final Answer: 5%

Question 2

Highway geometric design – Lemniscate transition: relationship of deviation angles For a lemniscate transition curve used in highway alignment, what is the ratio of the maximum deviation angle to the maximum polar deflection angle?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Lemniscate curves are occasionally adopted in highway and railway alignment as smooth transition elements between tangents and circular arcs. They offer a curvature that varies in a controlled way with the polar angle, helping to moderate the rate of change of centrifugal acceleration and steering input. A commonly examined property is how the deviation angle compares to the polar deflection angle at their maxima. Given Data / Assumptions: A lemniscate transition curve is considered in plan. Definitions: deviation angle is the angle between the tangent at a point and the initial tangent; polar deflection angle is the angle in polar coordinates between the radius vector and the initial reference. We seek the ratio of their maximum values along the lemniscate. Concept / Approach: The lemniscate is known for a specific functional relationship between curvature and polar angle. Classical geometric derivations show that the maximum deviation angle is a fixed multiple of the maximum polar deflection for a standard lemniscate form. This ratio emerges from differentiating the tangent direction with respect to the polar angle and identifying the critical points (maxima). Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that for a lemniscate, the plan geometry ties tangent direction to the polar parameter.Set up expressions of tangent orientation versus polar angle and find critical points by setting the derivative to zero.Evaluate the two maxima (deviation and polar deflection) and take their ratio.Standard results for the lemniscate give a ratio of 2. Verification / Alternative check: Textbook tabulations for transition curves list characteristic angle relationships for clothoids and lemniscates. For the lemniscate, the tabulated ratio of maximum deviation to maximum polar deflection is reported as 2. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 3, 4, 5, 6: These do not match the established geometric property of the lemniscate and would overstate the tangent swing for a given polar deflection. Common Pitfalls: Confusing properties of the lemniscate with those of the clothoid (cubic parabola/Euler spiral). Mixing definitions of deviation and deflection angles can also lead to incorrect ratios. Final Answer: 2

Question 3

Transition length on highways – controlling criteria The required length of a transition curve on a highway is governed primarily by which criterion(s)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Transition curves connect tangents to circular curves so that curvature does not change abruptly. Two serviceability considerations control how long a transition must be: vehicle dynamics (comfort and safety) and construction/operational needs for gradually introducing super-elevation. Given Data / Assumptions: Design speed and curve radius are known for the alignment. Super-elevation is introduced progressively over the transition length. Comfort criterion limits the rate of change of radial acceleration felt by occupants. Concept / Approach: Criterion 1: Limit the rate of change of radial acceleration so that lateral jerk remains within acceptable comfort limits. Criterion 2: Provide adequate length to rotate the crossfall from normal camber to full super-elevation without exceeding construction and drainage constraints. The selected transition length should satisfy both criteria, and the larger of the two governs. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute L based on allowable rate of change of radial acceleration.Compute L based on required super-elevation runoff and rotation rate.Adopt the larger L to satisfy both comfort and construction needs.Hence, both (a) and (b) govern the design. Verification / Alternative check: Design manuals list both checks and require using the governing (greater) length. Field performance confirms that ignoring either leads to discomfort or impractical crossfall development. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Relying on just one criterion may yield too short a transition, causing either discomfort (jerk) or abrupt crossfall changes that are difficult to build and maintain. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting to coordinate transition with the super-elevation runoff; omitting lane-by-lane rotation implications on multi-lane highways. Final Answer: both (a) and (b)

Question 4

Types of highway horizontal curves – identify the incorrect option On highways, which of the following listed as a “circular curve” type is incorrect?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Horizontal curve classification is fundamental to geometric design. Simple, compound, and reverse curves are standard horizontal curve types. Vertical curves, however, belong to longitudinal profile design and are not circular in standard practice. Given Data / Assumptions: We are classifying curve types used in highway alignment. “Circular curves” here refers to horizontal alignment elements using constant radius segments. Concept / Approach: Simple, compound, and reverse curves are all built from constant-radius arcs in plan. Vertical curves are used in profile to connect grades; they are typically parabolic to provide a uniform rate of change of grade, not circular. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify horizontal circular curve types: simple, compound, reverse → correct.Identify vertical curve: used in profile with parabolic form → not a circular curve type.Therefore, the incorrect option is vertical curves. Verification / Alternative check: Sight distance and comfort analyses for vertical curves rely on parabolic geometry; this further confirms they are not circular. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options (a), (b), and (c) are valid classifications of circular curves in plan view. Common Pitfalls: Confusing plan and profile elements; assuming all curves are circular regardless of orientation. Final Answer: vertical curves

Question 5

Shoulder drainage – minimum crossfall requirement What is the typical minimum crossfall (transverse slope) provided on highway shoulders to ensure positive drainage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Shoulders play a critical role in pavement edge support and surface drainage. Without adequate crossfall, water ponds at pavement edges, increasing moisture damage and reducing safety. Given Data / Assumptions: Paved or earthen shoulders are contiguous with the main carriageway. Objective is to ensure runoff without excessive slope that may be uncomfortable or erodible. Concept / Approach: Design guides recommend a minimum transverse slope for shoulders typically around 2.5% to provide reliable drainage while maintaining stability and comfort. Steeper slopes may be used for unsealed shoulders based on soil and rainfall, but a minimum of 2.5% is a widely adopted baseline. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the drainage need → avoid edge ponding.Adopt standard minimum → 2.5% crossfall on shoulders.Increase only if local conditions (soil/erosion) warrant it. Verification / Alternative check: Typical sections in design manuals show shoulder slopes equal to or slightly steeper than the camber of adjacent lanes, with a common minimum of 2.5%. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.5–1.5% may be insufficient to drain during heavy rain; 3% can be acceptable but is not the baseline minimum—2.5% is the conventional lower bound. Common Pitfalls: Using too flat a slope near sag locations; neglecting erosion control when increasing slope on unsealed shoulders. Final Answer: 2.5%

Question 6

Pavement markings – width of broken centre line on a four-lane road What is the typical standard thickness (width) adopted for broken centre line markings on a four-lane highway?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Pavement markings communicate lane discipline and passing restrictions. The width of the line affects visibility, retroreflectivity performance, and material consumption, and is standardized for uniformity and driver expectancy. Given Data / Assumptions: Broken centre line used to separate opposing flows or delineate lanes, on a four-lane facility. Conventional thermoplastic/paint application. Concept / Approach: Most standards specify a nominal line width for longitudinal markings (centre and lane lines) commonly equal to 10 cm for multi-lane highways. Wider markings (e.g., 15 cm) are generally reserved for edge lines or special applications where added conspicuity is desired. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the marking: broken centre line on a four-lane highway.Apply the standard width used for longitudinal lane/centre lines.Select 10 cm as the typical standard thickness (width). Verification / Alternative check: Field practice across jurisdictions aligns with 10 cm as the default for lane and centre lines; agency supplements may prescribe different widths for special corridors. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 12–20 cm are either nonstandard for this specific marking or used for other line types (e.g., wider edge lines, chevrons, or barrier lines). Common Pitfalls: Confusing broken centre line with double solid/no-passing markings, which can have different configurations. Final Answer: 10 cm

Question 7

Welded wire mesh in pavements – longitudinal wire spacing In welded wire mesh commonly used for slab/pavement reinforcement, the longitudinal wires are typically placed at what centre-to-centre spacing?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Welded wire mesh (WWM) is used in concrete slabs and pavements as temperature-shrinkage reinforcement and to control crack widths. Standard wire spacings simplify fabrication, placement, and lap calculations. Given Data / Assumptions: Use of WWM for slab reinforcement (temperature/shrinkage control). Typical mesh series produced with regular wire spacings. Concept / Approach: Common practice adopts 150 mm (15 cm) centres for one direction and sometimes 150–300 mm for the other, depending on slab thickness and crack control requirements. A 15 cm longitudinal spacing provides a good balance of steel distribution and constructability for typical highway slabs. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the longitudinal reinforcement direction in WWM.Select the standard, readily available spacing suitable for slab crack control.Adopt 15 cm centres as the typical answer. Verification / Alternative check: Standard WWM catalogs list 150 mm module meshes widely stocked for pavement and slab applications. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 10 cm provides tighter spacing but is less common for general pavement work; 20–30 cm are looser meshes and may not provide uniform crack control for thinner slabs unless wire sizes are increased. Common Pitfalls: Choosing mesh spacing without checking cover, lap, and placement tolerances; ignoring traffic-induced temperature gradients. Final Answer: 15 cm centres

Question 8

Hill roads – placement of side drains on spur and re-entrant curves Along a hill road, on which side should the longitudinal side drain be provided for spur curves and re-entrant curves to effectively intercept hillside runoff?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: On mountainous roads, controlling surface water is crucial for slope stability and pavement longevity. Improper drain placement can let hillside runoff flow across the carriageway, causing erosion, rutting, and safety hazards. Given Data / Assumptions: Two plan forms: spur (projecting outward) and re-entrant (valley-facing) curves. Objective: intercept hillside runoff before it reaches the carriageway. Concept / Approach: The side drain should be located on the hill side (inner side) so that runoff descending from upslope is captured immediately. Whether the alignment traverses a spur or skirts a re-entrant, the inner side is the controlling upslope side for interception, minimizing cross-traffic of water. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the hill side (inner side) for both curve situations.Locate the drain on this inner side to catch hillside water.Provide catch water drains as needed above the road to further intercept flows.Therefore, the correct placement is the inner side for both spur and re-entrant curves. Verification / Alternative check: Field manuals emphasize placing longitudinal drains on the hill side together with cross-drainage at regular spacing to lead water safely to the valley side via cross-drains or chutes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Placing drains on the outer (valley) side fails to intercept hillside runoff, allowing water to cross the pavement, which increases damage and accident risk. Common Pitfalls: Insufficient cross-drains for conveying the intercepted flow; neglecting protection of outlets against erosion. Final Answer: inner side of both (a) and (b)

Question 9

Earthwork logistics – borrow pits and spoil banks Which of the following statements about borrow pits and spoil banks in highway construction is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Efficient earthwork planning balances cut and fill and identifies sources (borrow pits) and sinks (spoil banks) for surplus or deficient material. Their location strongly influences safety, drainage, and environmental impact. Given Data / Assumptions: Borrow pits supply embankment material when in-situ cuts are insufficient. Spoil banks receive surplus excavated material that cannot be reused. Right of way (ROW) and adjacent lands are considered. Concept / Approach: Borrow pits are typically placed outside the acquired ROW to avoid weakening the verge, ensure safety, and maintain drainage. Depending on access and land agreements, they may lie on either side of the alignment. Spoil banks are generally consolidated on one side in designated areas to minimize obstruction and simplify protection/planting. Step-by-Step Solution: Confirm that borrow pits lie outside the ROW → correct.They can be on either side based on haul economy → correct.Spoil banks are usually planned on one side for management and erosion control → correct.Thus, all statements are correct. Verification / Alternative check: Good practice guides emphasize borrow pit setbacks, side selection by haul optimization, and controlled spoil placement and stabilization. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each individual statement is correct; none is false in this context. Common Pitfalls: Borrow pits too close to the carriageway leading to edge instability; uncontrolled spoil heaps obstructing drainage or visibility. Final Answer: All the above

Question 10

Design speed as a control – principles for geometric consistency Which statements about the role of design speed in geometric design are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Design speed is the foundational parameter that governs the selection of curve radii, sight distance, super-elevation, and other geometric elements. Consistency in design speed enhances safety and driver comfort by aligning user expectations with road geometry. Given Data / Assumptions: A homogeneous highway section is under design. Ruling design speed is applicable to terrain and functional class. Concept / Approach: Most geometric parameters are functions of design speed. To promote consistency, the design speed should remain uniform over stretches of similar context. If reductions are necessary, they should be gradual and signaled; abrupt changes can surprise drivers and cause crashes. Step-by-Step Solution: Confirm that features are sized for the ruling speed → correct.Uniformity of design speed along a route of similar environment → preferable.Avoid sudden design speed drops; provide transitions and warnings → principle of consistency.Therefore, all statements are valid. Verification / Alternative check: Consistency checks in design software evaluate speed-profile variations; guidelines call for minimizing unexpected reductions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: None; each component reflects accepted practice. Common Pitfalls: Mixing urban and rural design speeds within short distances; not coordinating posted speeds with geometric capability. Final Answer: all the above

Question 11

Purpose of horizontal curves – operational and safety benefits Why are horizontal curves provided on highways, beyond the basic need to change direction?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Horizontal curves are essential alignment elements that provide directional change smoothly. They also serve human factors objectives, improving safety and driver performance on long tangents. Given Data / Assumptions: Highway environment with potentially long, straight sections. Drivers may experience monotony and speed creep on very long tangents. Concept / Approach: Long unbroken tangents can induce monotony, leading to reduced vigilance and creeping speeds. Introducing suitable curves regulates operating speeds, provides visual stimulation, and reduces mental strain, thereby lowering crash risk without compromising capacity. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize human-factor benefits: curves break visual monotony → better vigilance.Speed management: curvature naturally moderates speeds → discourages overspeeding.Workload balance: curves and varying scenery reduce mental fatigue.Hence, all listed reasons apply. Verification / Alternative check: Operational studies link extremely long tangents to speed dispersion and inattention; context-appropriate curvature can mitigate these effects. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each individual reason is valid; none is incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Overusing sharp curves for speed control rather than employing context-sensitive design; failing to coordinate with sight distance and superelevation. Final Answer: all the above

Question 12

Highway camber calculation: A pavement 9 m wide has the crown 15 cm higher than each edge. Compute the camber (slope from crown to edge) and select the correct 1-in-N value.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Camber (also called crossfall) is provided on roads so that rainwater drains quickly from the crown to the edges. This problem checks your ability to compute the camber when the crown-to-edge level difference and pavement width are known. Given Data / Assumptions: Total pavement width = 9 m. Height difference between crown and one edge = 15 cm = 0.15 m. Camber is defined along half-width (from crown to one edge). Uniform straight-line crossfall on each side of the crown. Concept / Approach: Camber (slope) = rise / run. For a crowned section, the run is the half-width from crown to edge. Convert the rise to metres and express the final answer as a ratio 1-in-N. Step-by-Step Solution: Half-width = 9 / 2 = 4.5 m.Rise from edge to crown = 0.15 m.Camber e = rise / run = 0.15 / 4.5 = 0.033333...Express as ratio: e = 1 / 30 → camber = 1 in 30. Verification / Alternative check: Convert to percentage: 0.03333 * 100 ≈ 3.33%. This is a typical camber magnitude for bituminous or WBM surfaces, confirming reasonableness. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1 in 60 and 1 in 45 are milder than the computed slope; 1 in 15 and 1 in 7.5 are steeper than required. Common Pitfalls: Using the full pavement width (9 m) instead of half-width; forgetting to convert centimetres to metres; confusing percent slope with the 1-in-N form. Final Answer: 1 in 30

Question 13

Gradient resistance of moving vehicles along down slopes, is

Accepted Answer

- 9 kg/tonne

Question 14

Ruling gradient and reduction in vehicle load capacity: choose the correct percentage reduction corresponding to the stated gradient.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: On upgrades, the tractive effort available must overcome grade resistance. A practical thumb rule used in transport engineering is that the percentage reduction in load capacity is approximately equal to the grade (rise per 100) for moderate slopes. Given Data / Assumptions: Ruling gradient options: 1 in 10, 1 in 15, 1 in 20, 1 in 25. Assume moderate speeds and typical commercial vehicles. Reduction in load capacity roughly equals the grade percentage. Concept / Approach: Grade 1 in n corresponds to a slope of (1/n). As a percentage, this is (100/n)%. The reduction in load capacity is approximated by this percentage for quick checks in highway planning. Step-by-Step Solution: For 1 in 10: percentage grade = 100/10 = 10% → reduction ≈ 10%.For 1 in 15: percentage grade ≈ 6.67%, not 15%.For 1 in 20: percentage grade = 5%, not 10%.For 1 in 25: percentage grade = 4%, not 25%. Verification / Alternative check: The rule aligns with grade resistance per tonne being proportional to the slope, so doubling n halves the approximate percent reduction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They misinterpret the reduction as equal to n instead of 100/n, leading to unrealistic high reductions for gentle grades. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “1 in n” with “n percent”; forgetting that percent grade is (100/n)%. Final Answer: For 1 in 10, reduction is 10%

Question 15

Traffic control elements on a carriageway: the subsidiary area constructed within the paved area to channelize and regulate vehicle movement is called

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Channelization improves intersection safety and efficiency by guiding vehicles along intended paths. Special paved areas are constructed within the carriageway to separate conflicts and organize traffic flows. Given Data / Assumptions: We are naming a subsidiary area formed within the carriageway. Purpose: control and guide vehicle movements. Options include various roadside or median features. Concept / Approach: An island is a designated area (raised or flush) used to direct traffic, separate movements, and provide pedestrian protection at intersections or merges. It differs from medians (which separate opposing streams along a roadway segment) and from purely aesthetic features. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify need: channelization and control within the carriageway.Match definition: an island serves exactly this purpose.Select “island”. Verification / Alternative check: Design manuals classify channelizing, divisional, and pedestrian protection islands; the core function is traffic control within the carriageway. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Median strip separates opposing traffic along segments, not specifically for channelization at conflict points; flower bed is aesthetic, not a traffic device; a refuge refers specifically to pedestrian safety space and is a type of island but not the general term. Common Pitfalls: Using “median” generically; ignoring that many refuges are a subset of islands. Final Answer: island

Question 16

Road widening on curves in hilly terrain: where should the additional width be provided to best address off-tracking and safety?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: On horizontal curves, vehicles off-track toward the inside of the curve. In hilly terrain, space and stability concerns make the location of curve widening especially important for safety and constructability. Given Data / Assumptions: Hilly region alignment with retaining wall/slope on the valley side. Objective is to accommodate off-tracking and improve maneuverability. Conventional two-lane hill road with standard design speeds. Concept / Approach: Widening is preferably provided on the inner side of the curve. This aligns with the direction of off-tracking and improves sight distance by cutting into the hill rather than expanding toward the valley side, which could demand heavy protection works. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize off-tracking occurs to the inside (vehicle rear wheels cut the corner).Moving the inner edge outward provides effective additional roadway where it is needed.Construction practicality favors excavation at the hill side over fill toward the valley side. Verification / Alternative check: Design practice notes and safety audits in hilly regions consistently recommend inner-side widening for better control and reduced protective works. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Outer-side widening can be expensive and hazardous on valley side; equal widening splits benefits but is less efficient; “less on outer and more on inner” partly true but the question asks where it is done—the accepted concise answer is inner side. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring off-tracking magnitude and construction risk on valley side embankments. Final Answer: on the inner side

Question 17

Purpose of a traffic census: among common traffic engineering studies, which one is the principal objective of conducting a traffic census?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Traffic engineering employs several field studies to understand how roads are used. The term “traffic census” traditionally refers to counting vehicles to quantify usage patterns over time. Given Data / Assumptions: Traffic census = periodic vehicle counts on a link or at a station. Objective is to estimate traffic volume, composition, and temporal variation. Other studies (speed–delay, parking, O–D) are specialized and use different methods. Concept / Approach: A traffic census is fundamentally a traffic volume study. It provides Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), peak-hour volumes, vehicle classifications, and growth trends needed for planning, design, and strengthening decisions. Step-by-Step Solution: Define traffic census as systematic counting of vehicles.Identify its deliverables: AADT, composition, peak-hour factor.Hence select “traffic volume study”. Verification / Alternative check: Design standards reference traffic census data for capacity analysis, pavement design, and warrants for control devices. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Speed–delay studies measure travel times and causes of delay; parking studies quantify on/off-street parking demand; O–D surveys track trip patterns. They are not synonymous with a census. Common Pitfalls: Assuming one survey type substitutes for another; mixing up traffic counting with O–D cordon surveys. Final Answer: traffic volume study

Question 18

Geometric design in hills (snow-free): select the minimum radius of curvature typically adopted for National/State highways in hilly regions that are free from snow.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Horizontal curvature is constrained by terrain, speed, friction, and super-elevation limits. In hilly regions (snow-free), lower design speeds are permitted, allowing smaller radii—but not so small as to compromise safety and comfort. Given Data / Assumptions: Hilly terrain, snow-free (so higher super-elevation caps than snow-bound areas). National/State highway class. Low-to-moderate design speeds common for hill roads. Concept / Approach: Minimum radius is guided by the balance of centrifugal force with side friction and super-elevation. For low design speeds typical in hill roads, practical minimum radii around 30 m are used for absolute controls, with higher values desirable where feasible. Step-by-Step Solution: Acknowledge lower speeds permit smaller R while respecting max e and f.Select the smallest safe and commonly adopted absolute minimum in the list.Choose 30 m as the accepted minimum for snow-free hill conditions among the given choices. Verification / Alternative check: Check against typical design tables: absolute minimum radii reduce as design speed reduces; 30 m often appears as the lower bound for constrained hill alignments. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 25 m is generally too small for highway classes; 33–60 m are feasible but the question asks for minimum—30 m matches the common absolute control for this context. Common Pitfalls: Confusing desirable minimum with absolute minimum; ignoring snow-bound limitations on super-elevation. Final Answer: 30 m

Question 19

Recommended camber for straight roads with water-bound macadam (WBM) or gravel surface: choose the desirable range.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Camber ensures quick surface drainage, which is particularly critical for WBM and gravel surfaces that are more water-sensitive than cement concrete. Given Data / Assumptions: Surface type: WBM or gravel. Straight road segments (no added superelevation). Climate not otherwise specified; choose a conventional desirable range. Concept / Approach: For permeable or less bound surfaces, a slightly steeper camber is recommended than for dense bituminous or concrete surfaces. Typical ranges lie around 2.5% to 3%, i.e., about 1 in 40 to 1 in 33. Step-by-Step Solution: Convert ratios to percentages:1 in 40 = 2.5%; 1 in 33 ≈ 3.03%.This range suits WBM/gravel drainage needs without causing excessive edge erosion or vehicle instability. Verification / Alternative check: Field performance and standard camber tables for different surfaces corroborate this range. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1 in 33 to 1 in 25 (≈ 3 to 4%) is on the steeper side and may be excessive; 1 in 150 to 1 in 140 and 1 in 160 to 1 in 140 are far too mild for WBM/gravel and are typical of CC surfaces. Common Pitfalls: Using a “one value fits all” camber irrespective of surface type; ignoring erosion risk with very steep crossfall. Final Answer: 1 in 40 to 1 in 33

Question 20

Cubic parabolic transition curve for highways: select the standard relation (offset from tangent) commonly used for setting out.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Transition curves provide a gradual change of curvature from tangent to circular arc. A widely used highway transition is the cubic parabola, chosen for its simple field equations and smooth curvature variation. Given Data / Assumptions: x = distance measured along the tangent from the tangent point. y = offset from the tangent to the transition curve. R = radius of the circular curve that the transition leads into. L = length of the transition curve. Concept / Approach: For a cubic parabola, curvature varies linearly with arc length. The standard highway setting-out relation between the tangent offset y and station distance x is y = x^3 / (6 R L) (for small angles), enabling quick computation of offsets. Step-by-Step Solution: Start from linear curvature assumption: k = s / (R L).Relate small-angle geometry to derive offset y proportional to x^3.Obtain y = x^3 / (6 R L) as the practical setting-out formula. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with spiral geometry tables; the cubic-parabola approximation yields close agreement for typical transition lengths, validating field use. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (a) is a parabolic form unrelated to cubic transition; (c) and (d) have incorrect dimensions and omit L or misplace R and L; thus they do not represent the standard highway relation. Common Pitfalls: Using large-angle geometry beyond the range where the approximation holds; mixing up coordinate systems (offset from chord vs tangent). Final Answer: y = x^3 / (6 R L)

Highway Engineering Questions