Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only II follows.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The statement highlights a competitiveness gap: rival nations are using better agronomic practices and outperforming India in yield/quality despite India’s genetic contributions (root stocks). Sustainable leadership requires productivity, quality, and reliability—primarily through modern cultivation, post-harvest handling, and supply-chain upgrades.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Comparative advantage should be rebuilt via technology: high-density planting, precision fertigation, integrated pest/disease management, better drying/curing for quality grades, and certification (residue, traceability). Export bans on root stocks (I) are backward-looking and hard to enforce; price cuts (III) erode margins without addressing productivity.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Disseminate modern agronomy via extension; subsidise drip/fertigation and disease-resistant varieties.2) Upgrade post-harvest: solar dryers, moisture control, clean grading to hit premium specs.3) Build GI branding and traceability to command better prices.
Verification / Alternative check:
Yield/quality improvements raise farm-gate incomes and export competitiveness without race-to-the-bottom pricing.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I: Reactive and impractical; knowledge already diffused. III: Price-only competition undermines sustainability.
Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring post-harvest losses; relying solely on MSP/price policy.
Final Answer:
Only II follows.
Discussion & Comments