Statement: India’s leadership in black pepper is threatened as newer producer countries—using root stocks sourced from India—are outperforming by adopting modern cultivation practices. Courses of Action: I. Immediately stop supplying black pepper root stocks to other countries. II. Adopt modern cultivation technology domestically to remain competitive. III. Reduce export prices to stay competitive in world markets.

Verbal Reasoning Course of Action Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
  • A
    All follow.
  • B
    Only II follows.
  • C
    Only I follows.
  • D
    Only III follows.
  • E
    Both II and III follow.

Answer

Correct Answer: Only II follows.

Explanation

Introduction / Context:The statement highlights a competitiveness gap: rival nations are using better agronomic practices and outperforming India in yield/quality despite India’s genetic contributions (root stocks). Sustainable leadership requires productivity, quality, and reliability—primarily through modern cultivation, post-harvest handling, and supply-chain upgrades.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Competitors have adopted superior practices (trellising, drip irrigation, disease management, improved curing).
  • India’s issue is not genetic material scarcity, but agronomic efficiency.
  • Global prices are demand–supply driven; undercutting price may hurt farmer incomes.

Concept / Approach:Comparative advantage should be rebuilt via technology: high-density planting, precision fertigation, integrated pest/disease management, better drying/curing for quality grades, and certification (residue, traceability). Export bans on root stocks (I) are backward-looking and hard to enforce; price cuts (III) erode margins without addressing productivity.

Step-by-Step Solution:1) Disseminate modern agronomy via extension; subsidise drip/fertigation and disease-resistant varieties.2) Upgrade post-harvest: solar dryers, moisture control, clean grading to hit premium specs.3) Build GI branding and traceability to command better prices.

Verification / Alternative check:Yield/quality improvements raise farm-gate incomes and export competitiveness without race-to-the-bottom pricing.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Reactive and impractical; knowledge already diffused. III: Price-only competition undermines sustainability.

Common Pitfalls:Ignoring post-harvest losses; relying solely on MSP/price policy.

Final Answer:Only II follows.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion