Gas holdup in fermenters — The volumetric gas fraction (gas hold-up) depends mainly on which operating parameter(s)?
-
ASuperficial gas velocity (gas flow per cross-sectional area)
-
BPower consumption or specific power input (P/V)
-
CBoth (a) and (b)
-
DGas concentration (mole fraction) in the headspace only
-
EImpeller blade count has no effect on holdup
Answer
Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)
Explanation
Introduction:Gas hold-up, the fraction of reactor volume occupied by gas, is a key hydrodynamic variable affecting mass transfer and mixing. In aerated stirred tanks and airlift reactors, hold-up responds strongly to how much gas is introduced and how vigorously the liquid is agitated.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Continuous aeration with steady gas flow.
- Mechanical agitation or internal circulation contributing energy dissipation.
- Newtonian approximation for qualitative discussion.
Concept / Approach:Higher superficial gas velocity increases bubble population and volumetric gas fraction. Greater specific power input (P/V) promotes bubble breakup and longer residence through better dispersion, often raising hold-up up to a point. Thus, both gas rate and agitation intensity are the primary levers controlling gas hold-up, while headspace composition alone is insufficient to determine holdup in a well-mixed system.
Step-by-Step Solution:Relate holdup to gas flow: increase in superficial velocity increases gas fraction.Relate holdup to agitation: higher P/V reduces bubble size and increases dispersion, enhancing holdup.Select the combined option capturing both dominant dependencies.
Verification / Alternative check:Empirical correlations for gas hold-up include both superficial gas velocity and power input terms, validating the combined dependence.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- (a) Incomplete: ignores strong effect of agitation.
- (b) Incomplete: ignores strong effect of gas rate.
- (d) Headspace composition alone does not set holdup; it is a hydrodynamic outcome.
- (e) Impeller design influences hold-up via dispersion, so the statement is incorrect.
Common Pitfalls:Over-aerating beyond flooding limits, which can reduce effective holdup and k_La; assuming holdup is fixed for a given reactor independent of operating conditions.
Final Answer:Both (a) and (b)