Railway engineering materials — which timber species is considered the best overall choice for wooden sleepers used in Indian permanent way practice?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: sal

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Wooden sleepers (ties) transfer wheel loads from rails to the ballast and maintain correct gauge. Selecting the most suitable timber is crucial for durability, resistance to decay and insects, and the ability to hold fastenings under cyclic rail loads. In Indian railway practice, certain indigenous hardwoods have proven superior in the field.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The comparison is among commonly referenced Indian timbers: chir, deodar, sal, teak, and shesham.
  • Key performance criteria include strength, hardness, resistance to wear, decay and termites, spike-holding capacity, and economy/availability.
  • Sleepers are used under standard gauge loads and climatic exposures typical to India.


Concept / Approach:

Ideal sleeper timber should be hard and dense with good resistance to biological attack, must retain spikes well (high holding power), and exhibit minimal splitting. In practice, sal has consistently offered an excellent balance of strength, durability, and spike-holding capacity, making it the preferred choice in many Indian applications. Teak is durable but expensive; others often fall short in some critical property or economy.


Step-by-Step Solution:

List candidate timbers and compare on strength, durability, spike-holding, and cost.Teak: high durability but costly; sal: very strong, durable, excellent spike-holding, more economical.Deodar and chir: softer and less durable; shesham: good in furniture use, less common in sleepers.Select the timber that best satisfies performance and economy → sal.


Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists):

Field records and Indian railway manuals historically list sal as a primary sleeper timber due to its hardness and long service life under heavy traffic, confirming the choice over costlier teak in mass use.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Chir and deodar lack the hardness and wear resistance of sal. Teak is excellent but often prohibitive in cost and prioritized for special uses. Shesham is not a standard sleeper timber in large-scale permanent way practice.


Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes):

Equating “best” solely with durability (leading to teak) without considering economy and widespread availability; overlooking spike-holding performance, which is crucial to track integrity.


Final Answer:

sal

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion