Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both A and R are true and R is correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Understanding metallic resistivity at low temperature requires distinguishing between temperature-dependent phonon scattering and temperature-independent defect/impurity scattering (residual resistivity). The idealized “perfect crystal” clarifies the role of each mechanism.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Resistivity ρ can be considered as ρ = ρres + ρph(T). The residual term ρres is due to static defects and impurities; ρph(T) stems from electron–phonon scattering and decreases with temperature. In the strictly perfect crystal, ρres = 0. Therefore, ρ → 0 as T → 0 K.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify scattering sources: phonons (thermal), defects/impurities (structural).For a perfect crystal, structural scattering is absent ⇒ ρres = 0.As T decreases, phonon occupation falls; at 0 K, phonons vanish ⇒ ρph(0) = 0.Hence, total ρ(0) = 0, explaining A via R.
Verification / Alternative check:
Real crystals exhibit a finite residual resistivity plateau at low T due to unavoidable impurities/defects, confirming that deviations from periodicity dominate when phonons freeze out.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option denying R fails to recognize the two-term decomposition; denying A ignores the ideal limit definition.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing the idealized perfect-crystal limit with practical samples; attributing low-T saturation to phonons rather than impurities.
Final Answer:
Both A and R are true and R is correct explanation of A
Discussion & Comments