Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: dependent on the concentration of the minor (solute) component in the alloy
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Even at 0 K, real metals and alloys exhibit a finite “residual resistivity” due to static disorder such as impurity atoms and lattice imperfections. In alloys, this disorder is intrinsic to the mixed lattice.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Residual resistivity in alloys follows the Nordheim rule: scattering from compositional disorder depends on the probability of encountering unlike neighbors, typically scaling with c(1 − c), where c is the atomic fraction of the solute. Thus, ρres is composition-dependent rather than a simple arithmetic operation on the pure-metal residual resistivities.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Set T → 0 K ⇒ phonon contribution ρph → 0.Total ρ ≈ ρres determined by static scattering centers.In a random alloy, scattering rate increases with compositional disorder ⇒ ρres = f[c(1 − c)].Therefore, ρres varies with solute concentration and is not simply additive or multiplicative.
Verification / Alternative check:
Experimental plots of resistivity versus composition for systems like Cu–Ni or Ag–Au show maxima near intermediate compositions, consistent with c(1 − c) behavior.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Sum/difference/product of pure-metal residual resistivities ignores the dominant alloy-disorder scattering. Composition independence is contradicted by abundant data.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming Matthiessen’s rule implies simple addition of host and solute “resistivities” without considering how disorder scales with composition.
Final Answer:
dependent on the concentration of the minor (solute) component in the alloy
Discussion & Comments