Quantum numbers and angular momentum components Decide whether the statement is correct: “The magnetic quantum number determines the component of angular momentum along a prescribed (quantization) direction.”

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: True

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Atomic states are labeled by quantum numbers. Among them, the magnetic quantum number (commonly m_l for orbital angular momentum) is directly connected to the projection of angular momentum along a chosen axis, usually the z-axis. Understanding this mapping is fundamental for topics like Zeeman splitting and selection rules in spectroscopy.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Single-electron or many-electron atoms described by orbital quantum number l and magnetic quantum number m_l.
  • A fixed quantization axis (typically z) is defined by an external magnetic field or convention.
  • Non-relativistic angular momentum algebra applies.



Concept / Approach:
The magnetic quantum number m_l takes integer values from −l to +l. It specifies the eigenvalue of the angular momentum operator's z-component. The total magnitude of orbital angular momentum depends only on l, while the component along the quantization axis depends on m_l. This distinction explains spectral line splitting under magnetic fields (Zeeman effect), where different m_l states shift differently.



Step-by-Step Solution:
Angular momentum magnitude L depends on l via L = sqrt(l(l+1)) * ħ (conceptual relation).The quantized component along z is L_z = m_l * ħ.Therefore, m_l determines the specific allowed component of angular momentum along the chosen axis and explains directional properties of atomic orbitals in fields.



Verification / Alternative check:
Experimental Zeeman splitting patterns confirm that energy shifts are proportional to m_l (and g-factors), matching the interpretation that m_l labels the axial component.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“False” ignores core quantum principles. “True only for spin” is incorrect; both orbital (m_l) and spin (m_s) have axial projections. Statements claiming it sets only the magnitude or only the energy misunderstand the roles of l and m_l.



Common Pitfalls:

  • Confusing l (magnitude) with m_l (projection).
  • Forgetting that external fields define the preferred axis for projection quantization.



Final Answer:
True


More Questions from Materials and Components

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion