Select the related word from the given alternatives so that the analogy School : Teacher :: Court : ? is correctly completed.

Introduction / Context:
This analogy tests recognition of the relationship between an institution or place and a professional who commonly works there. In reasoning examinations, such questions measure how well candidates understand typical role and place associations in everyday life.

Given Data / Assumptions:
First pair: School : Teacher. Second pair: Court : ?. Words are used in their usual everyday meaning. Exactly one option should represent a parallel professional role for the court.

Concept / Approach:
In the pair School : Teacher, the school is the place or institution and the teacher is the professional who performs the main educational role there. To complete the analogy, we require a profession that is closely and directly associated with the court as a workplace. Although more than one profession operates in a court, the reasoning pattern typically selects the most directly associated role from the provided options.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Express the relationship. A school is a place where teachers work and teach students. Step 2: Transfer the structure. A court is a place where a particular type of professional works on legal matters. Step 3: Evaluate the options. Lawyer: A legal professional who represents clients and argues cases in a court. Play: A general activity, not a professional person. Tennis: A sport that is usually played on a court but not the profession itself. Justice: An abstract concept or title, not the standard label for a working professional in the options list. Judge: A key official of the court but given here as an extra distractor; however, traditional analogy sets with School : Teacher typically match to Court : Lawyer when both words are given as options. Step 4: Select the most parallel option. Lawyer is the professional most explicitly parallel to Teacher in the way the analogy is structured.

Verification / Alternative check:
The analogy may be expressed in sentence form: A teacher works in a school. A lawyer works in a court. This gives a clear place to professional relationship where teacher and lawyer play comparable roles in their respective institutions. Judge is also a court professional, but the pair School : Teacher usually leads to Court : Lawyer in standard exam patterns when both words appear as options, because both teacher and lawyer refer to practising professionals directly interacting with clients or students.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Play is an activity, especially associated with a playground or stage, not a professional person in a court. Tennis is a sport played on a tennis court but not the type of court meant in the legal context of the question. Justice is a concept and a formal title, but not used in this set as the direct counterpart of Teacher in the pair. Judge is an important court official, but the typical reasoning pattern here aligns School : Teacher with Court : Lawyer based on common exam practice and the specific set of answer choices.

Common Pitfalls:
Learners may confuse the sports sense of the word court with the legal sense. It is important to read the full set of options and identify which sense makes the entire list coherent. Another common issue is selecting an abstract concept rather than a person when the first pair clearly links an institution to a human role. Focusing on the exact grammatical and semantic category of each word helps in avoiding such mistakes.

Final Answer:
The analogy School : Teacher :: Court : ? is correctly completed by Lawyer.