Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)
Explanation:
Introduction:
Axial-flow impellers are widely used in bioprocessing because they move fluid primarily along the impeller axis (parallel to the shaft), giving strong top-to-bottom circulation with relatively lower shear compared to many radial designs. This question checks recognition of design features that create axial flow patterns.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Blade pitch creates an axial component of velocity. A pitched-blade turbine around 45° is a standard axial-flow choice. Descriptions that explicitly state the liquid is directed toward the base (down-pumping) also define axial flow. Large blade pitch angles approaching vertical (e.g., 75° to the vertical) are atypical for efficient axial pumping. Radial turbines (e.g., Rushton) push liquid outward from the blade tips, not along the shaft.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify axial indicators: blade pitch around 45° and explicit down-/up-pumping descriptions → axial.Exclude non-axial: Rushton-type radial turbines and extreme blade orientations that reduce axial pumping efficiency.Select the option that includes both correct axial descriptors.
Verification / Alternative check:
Mixing handbooks categorize pitched-blade turbines (~45°) as axial, commonly used for blending, heat transfer, and solid suspension at moderate to low shear.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing radial discharge (perpendicular to shaft) with axial flow; assuming any pitched blade is axial regardless of pitch angle or installation.
Final Answer:
Both (a) and (b)
Discussion & Comments