Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should hallmarking of gold be made compulsory in India? Arguments: I. Yes, this is would not only protect consumer interest, but also give more credibility to the manufactures in the international jewellery market. II. No, hallmarking would damage the product and it will further decrease its utility.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong

Explanation:

I is strong because it cares for consumers and manufactures both. II is weak. Because it wrongly assumes that there is no way of hallmarking of gold without damaging its utility.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should Indian government allow the neighboring country X to dump huge quantities of vansapati ghee into Indian at a price which is cheaper than market price? Arguments: I. No, it is a violation of the fundamental right of the farmer to grow crops and of that of the industry to operate with a level playing field. II. Yes, it is essential for Indian to provide shelter to all the industries of X at all costs because it is a neighboring country.
Statement: Should all the students be given fee all-route railway passes? Arguments: I. Yes, if we want real prosperity of nation, we really need so. II. No, we should not indulge in any plan to mar the life of students.
Statement: Should state police or central police be banned form firing indiscriminately on the rampant mob in a trouble-torn area? Arguments: I. Yes, humans should always be treated in a humanitarian way. II. No, this is the only way to restrict the rampant mob from indulging in illegal activities.
Statement: Should there be a screening test only for those doctors who get their qualification from foreign universities and want to practise in India? Arguments: I. Yes, the move will be effective by controlling the quality of doctors coming into India. II. No, there is no similar screening procedure for Indian graduates.
Statement: Should there be a ban on using mobile phones while driving vehicles? Arguments: I. No. This will affect the basic purpose of keeping a mobile phone. II. Yes. Two works simultaneously should not be permissible.
Statement: Should there be a ban on surnames which reflect the cast and religion of persons? Arguments: I. Yes, This move will encourage communal harmony which is very much desirable in secular states like India. II. No, It is against our old social customs and traditions.
Statement: Should private courier services be banned in India? Arguments: I. Yes, a lot of manipulation regarding charges has been witnessed by many courier services. II. No, private services always provide better services than other.
Statement: Should registration of marriages be made mandatory for Indian citizens? Arguments: I. Yes, This will help in legal processes when any problem related whit marriages erupts. Besides, it will also be helpful for government while planning activities ,etc. II. No, those thing which bring spouses closer must be devoid of red-tapism.
Statement: Should people be allowed to rear endangered species like musk deer for commercial purposes? Arguments: I. Yes, prosperity of a nation depends upon the prosperity of its citizens. If more options of earning will be there before a citizen he/she will certainly become wealthy . II. No, people have no right to fulfill their commercial desire by marking endangered species more endangered or extinct.
Statement: Should a person found sending racist messages on internet be prosecuted? Arguments: I. Yes, sending racist email message is a part of overall phenomenon of ''hate-speech'' on the internet which is meant for civil communication. II. No, our constitution provides us freedom of speech; than why prosecution?

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion