Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should India attack Pakistan? Arguments: I. Yes, we have defeated them three times; now it needs another defeat. II. No, if India succeeds in the fourth war, we will have no opponent left a fifth war.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong

Explanation:

Both arguments are ridiculous. Neither of them says about the positive or negative aspect which compels India to attack or restrain itself to take such harsh initiatives.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should politicians be made to declare their educational qualifications? Arguments: I. Yes, to develop a global perspective and represent India on the world map it is the need of the hour because a sound educational background guarantees some degree of understanding of the needs of the nation. II. No, what do we need ___ a leader an academic?
Statement: Are beauty pageants an insult to a woman's intelligence? Arguments: I. Yes, beauty pageants give more emphasis on physical beauty. II. No, if anyone thinks so, he or she is not aware of the positive aspects of beauty pageants.
Statement: Should all the electricity state boards be privatised in India? Arguments: I. No, this will increase the grievances of the people. II. Yes, it will check the growing menace of power theft which has resulted in annual pilferage of a huge amount.
Statement: should school invite IIT students to give practical tips on science subjects? Arguments: I. Yes, IIT students can be a boon to the careers of science students by giving them proper guidance that they certainly require at the stage of their schooling. II. No. IIT students have more vital responsibilities to carry out for which they have been prepared.
Statement: Should all eve-teasing offences be made non-bailable? Arguments: I. No. This will create disappointment among eve-teasers. II. Yes. This is the need of the hour.
Statement: Should there be an amendment in the acts related to check-bouncing? Arguments: I. Yes, Existing laws are not sufficient in curbing the incidents related to check-bouncing. II. Yes. This will lessen the miseries of entrepreneurs due to increase in number of incidents of delay in payment and problems related to check-bouncing.
Statement: Should Foreign Direct Investment be allowed in print media in India? Arguments: I. Yes. The entry of foreign investment will bring in healthy competition and the best of technology which is now confined to only a few publications. II. No. The foreign publications with their money and managerial power will overwhelm the weak Indian press, especially the regional press.
Statement: Should corporal punishment be banned in schools? Arguments: I. Yes, if a student fails to perform well it should be released that it is due to the teacher's fault. Inculcation of value of ethics should be preferred to corporal punishment. II. No an adamant child can't be forced to study unless he/she is treated with corporal punishment.
Statement: Should the pension schemes in government services be abolished? Arguments: I. Yes, this will reduce the number of aspiring candidates to a great extent and it will be easy for the common man to get into govt services. II. No, this will destroy the very purpose of providing financial help to the employee so that they can sustain themselves in old age.
Statement: Should restriction on rickshaw-pullers and prisoners for donation of blood be removed? Arguments: I. Yes, by putting these restrictions, a large section of public are not able to donate their blood event their own relatives in emergencies. II. No, blood donation is men to save people's life; if fingers are pointed towards someone's eligibility as a donor owing to possibility of non suitable or erroneous blood, then such persons must be restricted from doing so.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion