Statement: Should banks be allowed to offer different interest rates in India? Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to eventually lower interest rates in the country. II. No, this will discourage the customers and they might be compelled to switch over from one bank to another.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong

Explanation:

there is no relation between statement and argument so we cannot relate each other.
if neither I nor II is strong

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Is the WTO regime unfair to India? Arguments: I. Yes, the WTO bureaucracy has been openly supporting the agenda of large capital form the developed countries, and increasingly does not even pay lip service to the genuine demands of developing countries like India. II. No, if India cannot come up whit a consistent approach that links its domestic economic policy to its global trade strategy, why blame the WTO?
Statement: Is using Gandhi (father of the Indian nation) as a brand an insult to him? Arguments: I. No, if we name a road, park, street, stadium etc using the name of Gandhi, why using his name as a brand will be an insult to him? II. Yes, it is against the National Emblems Act and any contract entered into under the Indian Contract Act which violates any Indian low is void ab initio.
Statement: Should there be punishment in Indian for those who have more than two child? Arguments: I. Yes. It is very much desirable because there is no other way to control population growth, which is hampering the development of the country on every front. II. Yes. If we want to a developed country like China, we should follow it.
Statement: Should there be a compulsory education till matriculation for every citizen of Indian? Arguments: I. Yes. Lack of education is the root cause of every evil, viz poverty, unemployment etc. II. No. It will be a violation of human right.
Statement: Should corruption-free services from the bureaucrats be made a fundamental right for the citizens of India? Arguments: I. Yes, the move will eliminate corruption from the bureaucracy and bring happiness to the citizen. II. No, this will give a free hand to citizens to intervene in the work of bureaucracy and discourage the bureaucrats.
Statement: Should there be a licence regime for internet services and e-commerce? I. Yes, this will check fraud and malpractices. II. No, any such type of step will impede progress of internet services and e-commerce in the era of globalisation and liberalisation.
Statement: Would the resumption of cricketing ties contribute to normalisation of Indo-Pak relation? Arguments: I. No, normalisation of Indo-Pak relation needs bipartite dialogue to sort out debatable problems. II. Yes, music , sports etc bring harmony among peoples and it is a well-known fact that sport will definitely help ensure normalization of relations.
Statement: Should private Investors be allowed to invest in defence production? Arguments: I. Yes. We should stress on quality. If private investors are allowed to invest in defence production, a competition for good quality will arise among them. This will help us to harness our defence sector whit ammunitions of good quality. II. No. It will be better to keep our defence sector under veil, otherwise it will create threat to the integrity of the nation.
Statement: Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized? Arguments: I. Yes. It would lead to higher production. II. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.
Statement: Should the educated unemployed youth be paid "unemployment allowance" by the Government? Arguments: I. Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kickstart some 'self -employment' venture. II. No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their Livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion