Directions: Study the following information carefully to answer the given questions. An uncertain number of persons are sitting in a straight line facing the north direction. The persons sitting at the odd-numbered positions are Managers and the persons sitting at the even-numbered positions are Associates in different companies. Both X and Z are seated to the left of U and P, but to the right of Q. There are five persons between J and G. The person sitting fifth to the right of Q is an Associate. Two persons are seated between Q and R. The number of persons sitting between Q and the Manager at the extreme left end is one more than the number of persons sitting between J and P. The number of persons sitting between R and G is the same as the number of persons sitting between X and Z. Four persons are seated between Q and T, who is not seated to the right of R. The Manager at the extreme left end of the row is S. Three Managers are seated between T and X. J sits 3rd to the right of R. The number of persons sitting between Q and R is one more than the number of persons sitting to the right of G. P is the third Associate to the right of J. Which of the following statements is definitely true?
Verbal Reasoning
Seating Arrangement
Difficulty: Hard
Choose an option
-
AThe number of persons sitting to the right of Z is equal to the number of persons sitting between Q and R.
-
BT is seated to the right of X.
-
CS is seated to the right of J.
-
DThe number of Managers sitting between X and P is more than two.
-
EThe person is seated 5th to the right of Q is P.
Answer
Correct Answer: The number of Managers sitting between X and P is more than two.
Explanation
### Concept & Logical Deduction
Evaluating statements in complex seating arrangements requires checking each option against your firmly established position sequence.
### Step-by-Step Solution
Let's evaluate each option using our decoded 20-person linear arrangement:
* Master Sequence Snapshot: S(1), T(2), Q(7), X(8), R(10), J(13), Z(17), P(18), G(19), U(20).
* **Option A**: Number of persons right of Z(17) is 3 (positions 18, 19, 20). Persons between Q(7) and R(10) is 2. Since 3 $\neq$ 2, this is FALSE.
* **Option B**: T is at position 2, X is at 8. T is to the *left* of X, not right. FALSE.
* **Option C**: S is at position 1, J is at 13. S is to the extreme *left* of the row, so it cannot be right of J. FALSE.
* **Option D**: Check the number of Managers (odd positions) strictly between X(8) and P(18). The odd positions between 8 and 18 are: 9, 11, 13(J), 15, and 17(Z). There are exactly 5 Managers between them. Since 5 is strictly "more than two", this statement is TRUE.
* **Option E**: The person seated 5th to the right of Q(7) would be at position $7 + 5 = 12$. P is seated at position 18. FALSE.
### Exam Strategy & Shortcut
When checking positional statements, only evaluate what is strictly necessary. For Option D, noting that X is 8 and P is 18 means the gap is 9 people. In any sequence of 9 alternating people, there will be at least 4 odd positions (Managers). This instantly confirms it is more than two without even identifying them perfectly.
### Common Pitfall
Skimming over relational words. Misreading "Managers sitting between" as "Total persons sitting between" can cause hesitation, though both would technically be more than two in this specific case. Precision is key.
### Final Answer
Therefore, the correct answer is **The number of Managers sitting between X and P is more than two.**