Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 15/16
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Designers often prefer hollow shafts to save weight while maintaining torsional strength. Torque capacity at a given allowable shear stress is proportional to the polar moment of inertia J of the section. Comparing J for solid and hollow circular sections quantifies the efficiency of material distribution.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:For a circular shaft, maximum shear stress tau_max = T * R / J. At a fixed tau_allow, torque capacity T_allow ∝ J / R. For shafts with the same outer radius R, the ratio of allowable torques equals the ratio of J values. Here, both have the same outer radius, so T ratio simplifies to J ratio.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Solid shaft: J_s = (pi / 32) * D^4.Hollow shaft: J_h = (pi / 32) * (D_o^4 − D_i^4).With D_o = 100 and D_i = 50: J_h / J_s = (100^4 − 50^4) / 100^4.Compute: 50^4 = (1/16) * 100^4 → J_h / J_s = 1 − 1/16 = 15/16.Verification / Alternative check:Numeric check confirms 0.9375 fraction. The modest reduction in capacity versus large weight saving highlights the advantage of hollow shafts.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Comparing torque per unit weight without accounting for equal outer diameter; or forgetting to use the fourth power in J calculations.
Final Answer:15/16
Discussion & Comments