Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 4/5
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This is a complementary counting problem. Instead of directly counting outcomes where the minimum is less than 4, it is often easier to count the opposite event and subtract from 1.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Let E be the event “min < 4”. Its complement E^c is “both numbers ≥ 4”. The subset {4,5,6} contains 3 numbers; choosing both from it gives pairs with minimum ≥ 4. Count pairs in E^c, then compute 1 − P(E^c).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Total pairs = C(6,2) = 15.Pairs with both ≥ 4: choose from {4,5,6} ⇒ C(3,2) = 3.P(E^c) = 3/15 = 1/5.Therefore P(E) = 1 − 1/5 = 4/5.Verification / Alternative check:Direct count for min < 4: any pair that includes at least one of {1,2,3}. Counting shows 12 out of 15 pairs, i.e., 4/5, consistent with the complement approach.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:14/15 would require only one “bad” pair, but there are 3; 1/15 or 1/5 reflect counting the complement or partial cases only.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing ordered vs unordered counting; the event depends only on the set of two numbers, not their order, so combinations are appropriate.
Final Answer:4/5
Discussion & Comments