Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 4/5
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a complementary counting problem. Instead of directly counting outcomes where the minimum is less than 4, it is often easier to count the opposite event and subtract from 1.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Let E be the event “min < 4”. Its complement E^c is “both numbers ≥ 4”. The subset {4,5,6} contains 3 numbers; choosing both from it gives pairs with minimum ≥ 4. Count pairs in E^c, then compute 1 − P(E^c).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Direct count for min < 4: any pair that includes at least one of {1,2,3}. Counting shows 12 out of 15 pairs, i.e., 4/5, consistent with the complement approach.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
14/15 would require only one “bad” pair, but there are 3; 1/15 or 1/5 reflect counting the complement or partial cases only.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing ordered vs unordered counting; the event depends only on the set of two numbers, not their order, so combinations are appropriate.
Final Answer:
4/5
Discussion & Comments