Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Triacs and silicon-controlled rectifiers (SCRs, or thyristors) are common in power control. Understanding which device fits DC control versus AC control prevents serious design errors. The prompt claims triacs are better for DC control, which runs counter to standard practice.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Triacs rely on current falling below a holding value to turn off. In AC circuits, the line current naturally crosses zero every half-cycle, providing natural commutation. In DC circuits, there is no natural current zero; once triggered, a triac may remain latched until supply removal or forced commutation—making it poor for straightforward DC control. SCRs, by contrast, are inherently suited to DC power control in chopper/controlled rectifier topologies with appropriate commutation schemes, and they offer robust current handling in one direction.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Application notes show triacs dominating light dimmers and AC motor speed controls (single-phase), whereas SCRs appear in DC supplies, HV DC links, field excitation of machines, and rectifier bridges.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any bidirectional device is superior; forgetting that device turn-off physics dictates application fit.
Final Answer:
Incorrect.
Discussion & Comments