Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: piezoelectric and piezoresistive
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Accelerometers convert inertial acceleration into an electrical signal. Selecting the correct transducer type is critical for bandwidth, sensitivity, and environmental robustness. This item asks you to identify two common acceleration-sensing technologies from mixed lists that include non-acceleration sensors.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Piezoresistive and piezoelectric accelerometers are both widely used. Piezoelectric types generate charge proportional to force (and hence acceleration of a proof mass) and excel at high-frequency vibration measurements. Piezoresistive types use strain-sensitive resistors in a bridge and are good for low-frequency and shock measurements. MEMS capacitive accelerometers are also common, but among the given options, “piezoelectric and piezoresistive” is the correct pair. LVDT measures displacement, RTD measures temperature, and “magnetic pickup” is typically a velocity sensor (e.g., for rotating machinery), not a direct acceleration transducer.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Instrumentation catalogs categorize accelerometers mainly as piezoelectric, piezoresistive, and MEMS capacitive. Training material for vibration analysis emphasizes piezoelectric devices for broad dynamic ranges and piezoresistive for low-frequency, high-shock environments.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Equating any motion sensor with accelerometers; overlooking that many systems derive acceleration from position/velocity but that is different from direct acceleration sensing.
Final Answer:
piezoelectric and piezoresistive.
Discussion & Comments