Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
 Structural steel projects involve many parts fabricated with allowed tolerances for length, hole location, camber, and squareness. When components come together in the field, these tolerances accumulate (stack up), impacting alignment and fit. This question tests awareness of why tolerance management matters in drawings and shop details.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
 Even small individual deviations can add up so mating parts no longer align within hole clearances or weld fit-up gaps. Good drawings account for stack-up by providing slots, oversize/short-slotted holes where allowed, erection clearances, and adjustable details. Claiming “little effect” underestimates the need for proper tolerancing and field adjustability.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify all contributing tolerances (fabrication, layout, hole drilling).2) Sum worst-case or perform statistical stack-up for critical joints.3) Incorporate allowances (slots, shims, erection clearances) into details.4) Check that combined variability stays within connection capacity and code limits.
Verification / Alternative check:
 Field fit-up issues and RFIs frequently cite misaligned holes or bearing surfaces due to cumulative tolerances; standard practice prescribes oversize holes or slots to mitigate this.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Limiting effects to stainless steel ignores that stack-up is geometric, not material-specific.Welded joints can also suffer from mismatch, root opening errors, and out-of-square conditions requiring rework.
Common Pitfalls:
 Neglecting erection tolerances; omitting slots where allowed; over-constraining connections so no adjustability remains.
Final Answer:
 Incorrect
Discussion & Comments