Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Structural steel shop drawings communicate to the fabricator exactly how plates, beams, columns, angles, and connections must be cut, drilled, welded, and assembled. The claim that these drawings are “usually calculated to the nearest 1/2 inch” oversimplifies industry practice and would be unacceptably coarse for most fabrication tasks.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Critical dimensions in steel fabrication (for example, gage lines, edge distances, bolt-hole centers) are commonly held to 1/16 in or 1/8 in accuracy. Coarser allowances (like overall frame fit-up) are addressed through erection tolerances and field-adjustment provisions. Conflating these two leads to the mistaken idea that all shop values round to 1/2 in.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify typical shop-controlled features: hole centers, copes, and plate dimensions.2) Note their standard tolerances (often 1/16 in or 1/8 in), which are finer than 1/2 in.3) Separate shop tolerances from erection tolerances (column plumb, beam camber).4) Conclude that “nearest 1/2 inch” is not the usual basis for shop calculations.
Verification / Alternative check:
Review any example shop drawing: bolt gage and edge distances are typically specified to two decimal places (in) or to fractional 1/16 in, confirming finer precision than 1/2 in.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct” ignores common fabrication tolerances; “Only hole diameters use 1/2 in rounding” is still too coarse; “1 in is the norm” is even less realistic; “Dimensions are always given without tolerances” is false since tolerance control is essential.
Common Pitfalls:
Mixing erection and shop tolerances; assuming coarse rounding is acceptable for bolt placement; omitting tolerance notes on drawings.
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments