Syllogism — Premises: Some teachers are students. All students are girls. Conclusions: (I) All teachers are girls. (II) Some girls are teachers. (III) Some girls are students. (IV) All students are teachers.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:We combine one existential and one universal premise and check which conclusions are necessary. Given Data / Assumptions: Some Teachers are Students. All Students are Girls. Concept / Approach:Let T = Teachers, S = Students, G = Girls. From 'Some T are S' and 'S ⊆ G', we infer (II) Some girls are teachers (those teacher-students are girls) and (III) Some girls are students (since some students exist). The universal claims (I) and (IV) are not supported. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Pick x with x ∈ T ∩ S (from the 'some' statement).Step 2: From S ⊆ G, x ∈ G, so x ∈ G ∩ T — validates (II).Step 3: The existence of x ∈ S implies at least one student exists; since S ⊆ G, (III) holds.Step 4: There is no basis for 'All teachers are girls' (I) nor 'All students are teachers' (IV). Verification / Alternative check:Construct a model with many teachers not students and many girls not students; (II) and (III) remain forced while (I) and (IV) fail. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Options including (I) or (IV) assert unsupported universals. Common Pitfalls:Overgeneralizing from existence to universals; keep directions of subset relations straight. Final Answer:Only (II) and (III) follow.

Syllogism — Premises: Some teachers are students. All students are girls. Conclusions: (I) All teachers are girls. (II) Some girls are teachers. (III) Some girls are students. (IV) All students are teachers.

More Questions from Syllogism

Discussion & Comments