Logical reasoning — Social development programmes: Monitoring via Management Information Systems (MIS) to obtain feedback on performance and service delivery; determine which conclusions about evaluation and worker monitoring follow

Given data

• Statement: Monitoring is integral in planning social development programmes; MIS is recommended for all programmes to provide feedback on functionaries’ performance and service delivery efficacy.
• Conclusions to test:
  • I: All social development programmes should be evaluated.
  • II: There is a need to monitor the performance of workers.

Concept/Approach

If monitoring is integral and MIS is recommended for all programmes specifically to capture performance and efficacy, both evaluation (I) and worker performance monitoring (II) are explicit implications.

Step-by-Step reasoning
1) MIS for all programmes to generate feedback implies programme-level evaluation ⇒ I follows.2) Purpose includes feedback on functionaries’ performance ⇒ II follows directly.

Verification/Alternative

Remove the need to evaluate or monitor, and the recommendation of MIS loses its stated purpose, confirming both conclusions.

Common pitfalls

• Assuming “evaluation” is optional when the statement makes monitoring a core planning component.

Final Answer
Both I and II follow.