Critical Reasoning – Implicit Assumptions Statement: The school authorities have decided to increase the number of students in each classroom to seventy from the next academic session to bridge the gap between income and expenditure to a large extent. Assumptions: I. The income generated from the fees of additional students will be sufficient to bridge the gap to a large extent. II. The school will definitely get all the additional students in each class from the next academic session.

Introduction / Context:
Administrative decisions aimed at financial balance rely on revenue projections. The school plans to raise class size to increase fee income and thereby reduce the deficit. We must identify which assumptions are necessary for this decision to be sensible.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Plan: Increase class size to 70 students next session.
• Objective: Bridge the income–expenditure gap to a large extent.
• Assumption I: Added fee revenue will materially reduce the gap.
• Assumption II: Every class will certainly be filled to the new limit immediately.

Concept / Approach:
A policy to earn more from higher enrollment requires assuming that the incremental fee revenue meaningfully improves finances. However, it need not assume a guaranteed, exact headcount in every section. The plan can still make sense with “enough” additional admissions to meet financial goals even if not every seat is filled to capacity.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit