Critical Reasoning – Implicit Assumptions Statement: The two countries have signed a fragile pact, but the vital sovereignty issue remains unresolved. Assumptions: I. The two countries cannot have a permanent peace pact. II. The two countries may become hostile again after a short spell of time.

Introduction / Context:
Describing a pact as “fragile” while noting an unresolved sovereignty issue signals instability. We must determine which assumption is necessary for this characterization to matter.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Fact: A pact exists but is fragile.
• Issue: A vital sovereignty dispute remains unsettled.
• Assumption I: A permanent peace pact is impossible.
• Assumption II: Hostilities may resume soon.

Concept / Approach:
Calling a pact fragile presupposes risk of breakdown, not the impossibility of lasting peace. Thus, the necessary belief is the possibility of renewed hostility, not a categorical “never” on permanence.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:
Only assumption II is implicit