Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only assumption II is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The manager’s request aims to accelerate progress by increasing staffing. The question asks which assumptions are necessary for this request to be a reasonable plan for recovering from delay.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:An implicit assumption is one without which the directive collapses. The request presupposes that increasing team size improves output (at least in the short term and for this work). It does not require a general belief that delays are inevitable in most jobs.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Focus on causality: more people → higher output → schedule recovery.Negate II: If adding people does not improve productivity (or causes coordination overhead that cancels gains), the request is ineffective. Thus II is necessary.Negate I: Whether delays are “inevitable” broadly is irrelevant. The current project has a delay; action is proposed regardless of general philosophy about delays. Hence I is not required.Therefore, only II is implicit.Verification / Alternative check:In project management, schedule compression (e.g., crashing) assumes resource addition yields more output. That is the enabling assumption for the directive.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Equating a situational remedy with a broad belief about inevitability of delays; ignoring resource–throughput linkage.
Final Answer:Only assumption II is implicit
Discussion & Comments