Critical Reasoning – Implicit Assumptions Statement: The party president has directed that no member will give press briefings or interviews to government and private TV channels about the discussion in the scheduled party meeting. Assumptions: I. Party members will observe this directive of the president. II. The general public will not come to know about the happenings in the scheduled meeting of the party.

Introduction / Context:
The directive aims to restrict information flow by prohibiting members from briefing the press. We must identify what must be true for issuing such a directive to be a rational step toward the intended communication control.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Directive: No member should brief the press about the scheduled meeting's discussions.
• Assumption I: Members will comply with the president’s directive.
• Assumption II: Consequently, the public will not learn what happened in the meeting.

Concept / Approach:
For the directive to be effective, compliance is a necessary assumption. However, II asserts a guaranteed outcome (complete secrecy among the public), which is stronger than needed. Information can still leak via other channels (documents, non-member staff, investigative reporting). The order does not require a guarantee of total secrecy—only an attempt to reduce disclosures via members.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit