Critical Reasoning – Implicit Assumptions Statement: The party president has directed that no member will give press briefings or interviews to government and private TV channels about the discussion in the scheduled party meeting. Assumptions: I. Party members will observe this directive of the president. II. The general public will not come to know about the happenings in the scheduled meeting of the party.

Verbal Reasoning Statement and Assumption Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    Only assumption I is implicit
  • B
    Only assumption II is implicit
  • C
    Either I or II is implicit
  • D
    Neither I nor II is implicit
  • E
    Both I and II are implicit

Answer

Correct Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Explanation

Introduction / Context:The directive aims to restrict information flow by prohibiting members from briefing the press. We must identify what must be true for issuing such a directive to be a rational step toward the intended communication control.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Directive: No member should brief the press about the scheduled meeting's discussions.
  • Assumption I: Members will comply with the president’s directive.
  • Assumption II: Consequently, the public will not learn what happened in the meeting.

Concept / Approach:For the directive to be effective, compliance is a necessary assumption. However, II asserts a guaranteed outcome (complete secrecy among the public), which is stronger than needed. Information can still leak via other channels (documents, non-member staff, investigative reporting). The order does not require a guarantee of total secrecy—only an attempt to reduce disclosures via members.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Check I: Without member compliance, the directive would be pointless. Therefore I is implicit.Check II: Even with compliance, the public might still learn details through other means. Hence II is not necessary.

Verification / Alternative check:

Negate I: If members will not observe the directive, it fails in purpose. Negate II: Public may still know via leaks; the directive could still be rational as a deterrent measure. Thus I is necessary; II is not.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Only II (option b) ignores the prerequisite of compliance.Either (option c) and Both (option e) overstate the necessity of II.Neither (option d) is incorrect because I must hold.

Common Pitfalls:

Assuming that a communication ban guarantees total secrecy rather than merely reducing authorized disclosures.

Final Answer:Only assumption I is implicit

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion