Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only assumption II is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The statement claims that the end of a financial year is an “ideal time” for performance review. We must detect which conditions must hold for such a review to be feasible and meaningful, without overstating universality.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Calling a time “ideal” does not imply universal behavior; it suggests suitability, often because accounting closes and data crystallizes. The necessary condition is the availability of performance data for meaningful analysis, not that every company necessarily conducts the review then.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I is a universal claim (“all companies…”). The statement does not require this; it can be ideal even if some companies do it differently.II is required: No review is possible if the data are unavailable. Year-end typically finalizes accounts, making performance data accessible.Verification / Alternative check:
Negate II: If data are not available, the “ideal time” claim collapses—no review can occur. Negating I does not harm the claim’s plausibility.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I-only (option a) overgeneralizes behavior.Either (option c) and Both (option e) incorrectly elevate the universal behavior claim to necessity.Neither (option d) ignores the essential role of data availability.Common Pitfalls:
Confusing an “ideal time” assertion with “everyone must do it then.”Final Answer:Only assumption II is implicit
Discussion & Comments