Introduction / Context:
Scheduling a meeting one year in advance presumes the organization and its governing body will exist at that time. It does not presuppose dissolution; in fact, it presumes continuity.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Plan: Meeting after one year.
- Assumption I: The Institute will be operational then.
- Assumption II: The Governing Board will be dissolved after one year.
Concept / Approach:
- Forward planning assumes institutional continuity.
- Dissolution would contradict the scheduling of a future meeting.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assumption I is necessary; otherwise setting a meeting is pointless.Assumption II is contrary to the act of scheduling; not necessary and likely false.
Verification / Alternative check:
Remove I: planning loses sense. Remove II: planning remains valid; hence only I is implicit.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option involving II treats a contradiction as necessary, which it is not.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “after one year” with “for one year only.”
Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit
Discussion & Comments