Critical Reasoning – Identify the Implicit Assumption(s) Statement: Due to financial constraints, a management institute will charge a placement fee of Rs. 25,000 from the organisation where each student is placed (to be collected at the time of employment). Assumptions: I. This will increase the demand for the institute’s students. II. The amount collected in this way will serve a useful purpose. III. Organisations may select fewer students in the future.

Introduction / Context:
The institute introduces a placement fee charged to hiring organizations, citing financial constraints. We must decide which assumptions are necessary for this policy to make sense. The key is to separate what is merely possible from what must be true.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• New fee: Rs. 25,000 per recruited student, paid by the employer.
• Assumption I: Demand for students will increase.
• Assumption II: The collected amount will be purposeful (e.g., ease constraints).
• Assumption III: Employers may reduce future intake.

Concept / Approach:
The policy exists to relieve financial pressure. It does not presuppose an increase in demand (indeed, a fee could deter demand). Nor must it assume that employers will reduce intake; that is a possible risk, not a necessary belief. The only plausible necessity is that the money collected will actually help the institute meet financial needs. However, since none of the provided answer choices allows “Only II,” we must select the option that correctly reflects the mismatch—namely, “None of these.”

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:
None of these