Critical Reasoning — Implicit Assumptions Delegation request: “In my absence, I request you to look after the affairs of our company,” says B to C. Assumptions to evaluate: I. C may not accept B’s request. II. C has the expertise to handle the affairs of the company.

Introduction / Context:
When someone requests another to manage affairs in their absence, what must they believe for the request to be reasonable? We evaluate necessity of the two assumptions.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Request from B to C to handle company affairs.
• Assumption I: C might refuse.
• Assumption II: C is capable and competent to handle the role.

Concept / Approach:
Issuing a request presupposes that the recipient is able to do the job; otherwise the request is irrational. It does not require any belief that refusal is likely.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Negate II: C cannot handle affairs—the request is nonsensical. Negate I: C will accept—request still makes sense. Hence only II is implicit.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Only I / Either / Neither / Both: They either import an unnecessary doubt about acceptance or omit the essential capability assumption.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing possibility of refusal with the logic of making the request. Competence is key; acceptance probability is not required.

Final Answer:
Only assumption II is implicit