Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only III is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Managerial instructions often include conditional reporting requirements. We must determine what beliefs underpin the specific directive to inform in case of delay.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
An assumption is necessary if the instruction would be pointless without it. A conditional instruction to inform implies that informing is not guaranteed otherwise; it does not assert habitual noncompliance or disobedience in general.
Step-by-Step Solution:
III is necessary. The explicit instruction to inform in case of delay presumes that, without such instruction, the clerk might not inform.I is too strong. From the instruction we cannot infer a history of never informing.II is not necessary. Issuing an instruction does not entail that the clerk will disobey; it simply sets expectations.
Verification / Alternative check:
Negating III removes the need for the instruction. Negating I or II does not weaken the rationale for giving clear directions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Do not overinterpret a precautionary instruction as evidence of chronic failure.
Final Answer:
Only III is implicit
Discussion & Comments