Critical Reasoning — Assumptions Statement: "The economic condition continues to be critical even after a good harvest season." Which assumptions are implicit?

Introduction / Context:
The sentence contrasts a good harvest with a continuing critical economic condition. We must identify the presupposition that gives this contrast its force.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• I: The economy was not critical before the harvest.
• II: The economy could not have improved without a good harvest.
• III: The economy was expected to improve after a good harvest season.

Concept / Approach:
When a writer highlights persistence of a problem despite a favorable factor, the implicit belief is that the favorable factor typically helps. The statement does not state anything about the economy before the harvest nor claim that a good harvest is the only route to improvement.

Step-by-Step Solution:
III is necessary. The phrase even after a good harvest signals an expectation that such a harvest normally eases economic stress. The persistence of crisis is therefore noteworthy.I is not necessary. The sentence is silent on the earlier state; it only speaks about the current continuation of a critical condition.II is not necessary and is too strong. The statement does not assert that improvement is impossible without a good harvest; it simply notes that a good harvest did not suffice this time.

Verification / Alternative check:
Negating III removes the contrast and the informational value of the sentence. Negating I or II does not affect the logic.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• I with II, or II alone, or II with III: each includes a nonessential or extreme claim.
• I with III: adds an irrelevant temporal claim.

Common Pitfalls:
Do not overgeneralize to only necessary conditions when the language indicates a typical expectation, not exclusivity.

Final Answer:
Only III is implicit