Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 110°
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
At the river–canal junction, proper alignment of the head regulator relative to the river flow reduces entry losses, avoids excessive sediment ingress, and provides stable approach hydraulics. Design manuals recommend a range for the included angle to balance smooth entry with site constraints.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Aligning the canal approximately downstream and at an oblique angle to river flow (often recommended around 110°) yields smoother entry and better sediment exclusion than a sharp right-angle takeoff. Too small or too large angles can induce unfavorable eddies or head losses.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists):
Model studies (physical or CFD) often find a sweet spot slightly obtuse to the river direction; many projects adopt values near 110° when feasible.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
80°/90° produce sharper bends and more entry loss; 120° might over-align downstream and is less commonly cited as the baseline recommendation; 150° is excessive.
Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes):
Confusing this angle with bend angle inside the canal; ignoring local bathymetry and approach flow skew that may require fine-tuning.
Final Answer:
110°
Discussion & Comments