Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Effective span to overall depth ratio less than 2.0.
Explanation:
Introduction:
Deep beams are members with small span-to-depth ratios where plane sections do not remain plane and the usual beam theory is not applicable. Recognizing a deep beam triggers special analysis and detailing provisions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
For simply supported beams, the limit for being treated as a deep beam is commonly based on l_eff / D. Below a threshold, strut-and-tie or deep-beam methods are recommended rather than standard flexural theory.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Compute ratio R = l_eff / D.2) If R is less than 2.0, the beam is a deep beam.3) For continuous beams, the corresponding threshold is typically higher (about 2.5).
Verification / Alternative check:
Design manuals show deep-beam regions with arching action developing between supports and load points when spans are short relative to depth.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is an equality, not the criterion; Option B and D use the continuous-beam threshold; the correct limit for simply supported members is R less than 2.0.
Common Pitfalls:
Using overall depth versus effective depth inconsistently; applying continuous-beam limits to simply supported cases.
Final Answer:
Effective span to overall depth ratio less than 2.0.
Discussion & Comments