Concrete core acceptance by equivalent cube strength (IS-based): For accepting in-situ concrete by core tests, the average equivalent cube strength of the extracted cores must be at least 85% of the specified cube strength of the concrete grade at the specified age. No individual core result shall be less than what minimum percentage of the specified cube strength?

Civil Engineering Structural Design Specifications Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    90%
  • B
    85%
  • C
    80%
  • D
    75%
  • E
    70%

Answer

Correct Answer: 75%

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Core testing is used when standard cubes/cylinders are not representative or are unavailable. Codes specify how to judge acceptability of in-situ concrete based on core strengths compared with the specified grade's cube strength at the designated age.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Acceptance is based on equivalent cube strengths from drilled cores.
  • Average of cores must reach at least 85% of the specified characteristic cube strength.
  • There is also a lower bound for each individual core result.

Concept / Approach:Most codes derived from IS practice require both: (1) average core strength threshold and (2) minimum individual core threshold. The widely used limits are 85% (average) and 75% (individual). These limits acknowledge the inevitable reduction in core strength due to extraction, size, and moisture effects, while still ensuring structural adequacy.

Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Identify the governing acceptance clause for cores (average ≥ 85%).Step 2: Check the accompanying requirement for individual cores so that a single weak core does not pass the lot.Step 3: The minimum for any single core is taken as 75% of the specified cube strength.Step 4: Therefore, the correct limit for “no individual core” is 75%.

Verification / Alternative check:Typical national standards and many QA manuals list 85% (average) and 75% (single core) as paired criteria for core-based acceptance, reflecting empirical reductions observed for cores versus standard cubes.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:90%: Too conservative for individual cores; not the standard limit.85%: This is the average criterion, not the minimum per-core value.80%: Not a standard threshold in IS-based acceptance for individual cores.70%: Too low; would risk accepting under-strength concrete.

Common Pitfalls:

  • Confusing the average (85%) with the minimum individual limit (75%).
  • Comparing core strengths directly to cube strengths without applying the code-prescribed criteria.

Final Answer:75%

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion